If the "Pagan" question - i.e. who's Pagan and who isn't - were a political issue, it would decide elections. It's grown that large. It's come to a point where posts don't just reference others, they form catalogs of references to others. It's even spurred sub-issues: the "Christo-Pagan" question and the "Atheist Pagan" question (I have an obvious vested interest in the latter).
But in all this endless talk, few seem to have the balls to say in no uncertain terms what's really going on:
...-
"There's a painful cognitive dissonance coming from holding two mutually contradictory beliefs about ourselves: (1) We don't poli
-
Regarding common goals, how about recognition of our holidays, for example, or chaplains in prison, or freedom from persecution?
-
>So what common goals do you think naturalists and polytheists and other Pagans might embrace? I think you hit the nail on the he
-
Well said. Personally, "solidarity, not unity" makes perfect sense to me. But I was active in Green politics long before I came to