
In the wake of the epidemic of arson and property destruction that accompanied the first George Floyd protests in Minneapolis—currently estimated at some $26 million dollars worth—we've heard numerous voices raised to justify (or at least soft-pedal) such destruction.
People are more important than buildings, they say.
But I'm a pagan and, because I'm a pagan—as the ancestors did—I think that (in effect) buildings are people, too.
Now, the notion that a building could be a person falls pretty far outside the general overcultural definition of what a “person” is, so (without committing myself to metaphysical specifics) let me rephrase the question: Does a building have a spirit?
Speaking experientially, I suspect that most of us would answer: Yes.
This has implications.
Note that I'm not necessarily talking here about “spirit” in the sense of something separable from physical reality; what I mean here is a matter of integrity-within-self, of (as it were) “being-hood” or “self-ness.”
In this sense, as pagans, we recognize personhood in non-human beings as well.
Animals are people. Plants are people. Rivers are people. Mountains are people.
Looking at Received Tradition, we see that made beings are also considered to have spirit: think of the swords and spears wielded by the heroes of epic, for example. Would anyone, anywhere, actually contend that, for example, Stonehenge does not have a spirit?