One of the hottest points of contention between Atheopagans and both theists and hard-antitheist atheists has to do with naturalism. Naturalism is a philosophical position which holds that there is nothing which is not of the physical Universe: that there is nothing which is supernatural, and that such claimed supernatural phenomena as gods, spirits, souls, ghosts, and magic are fictitious.
Theists dispute this out of hand, of course. It makes sense that nontheist Pagans have friction with theists over this point.
...-
For the record, one fundamental difference between naturalistic Pagans and many others is that we embrace the scientific method wh
-
Mod note: Just a reminder to keep discussions courteous. We can agree to disagree on subjects of theology without being dismissive
-
I disagree. There is no credible scientific evidence for the existence of disembodied intelligences. Arbitrarily declaring that th
-
One need not discard the world of spirit to embrace nature. That is a false dichotomy, which springs from the monotheist religions